One country, two systems
Ryan Hass
The Michael H. Armacost Chair
Fellow - Foreign Policy, Center for East Asia Policy Studies, John L. Thornton China Center
Interim Chen-Fu and Cecilia Yen Koo Chair in Taiwan Studies
national security law will prevail over the English translation in the event of any discrepancy between the two, in a marked departure from the city’s official language policy which gives equal weight to both languages. But the move was sharply criticised by one lawyer, who noted discrepancies between the two versions, adding he had never seen such a poorly drafted piece of legislation. A retired judge admitted he was having difficulty understanding the English version. https://www.scmp.com/news/hong-kong/law-and-crime/article/3091894/national-security-law-chinese-version-prevail-over?utm_medium=email&utm_source=mailchimp&utm_campaign=enlz-scmp_today&utm_content=20200706&MCUID=3d06933c40&MCCampaignID=b4fe027d11&MCAccountID=3775521f5f542047246d9c827&tc=9
Ip: The death of "One Country, Two systems" has become a cliche. The foreign media has said at the time, before 1997, the Fortune magazine forecast the death of Hong Kong. But we have always bounced back. I think the past few decades because of Hong Kong's reunification, reabsorption into China, many have predicted that our separate lifestyle, separate systems will cease to exist. In fact, in the past 40 years, there have been many crises of confidence and brain drain, people trying to emigrate. But those who left have all come back. The money which left has come back. Hong Kong continued to be prosperous and successful, despite some short-term setbacks. So I believe that, in spite of some short-term worries about this new legislation, with the nation's backing for Hong Kong, we will be able to bounce back economically, socially, and internationally. https://news.cgtn.com/news/2020-07-01/The-West-s-fake-narrative-about-HK-national-security-law-RGEdED8pSo/index.html
Under a One Country, Two Systems agreement before the 1997 handover by Britain, China said it would let Hong Kong maintain certain liberties and autonomy until 2047 — including legislative and judicial independence. Deng’s comments are the first time a Beijing official has made clear that mainland authorities will have jurisdiction over some national security cases once the law is passed. Beijing’s rubber-stamp parliament has said the law will allow mainland security agencies to operate publicly in Hong Kong for the first time. Deng gave some details on Monday. “Both the central government and the Hong Kong government need to set up an organization dedicated to safeguard national security,” he said in a speech to the semiofficial Chinese Association of Hong Kong and Macao Studies think tank. Central authorities, he said, would “supervise and instruct” local authorities on enforcing national security. https://www.courthousenews.com/china-will-handle-some-hong-kong-security-cases/
As demanded by the pro-democracy movement, the Trump administration accepted the argument that the ‘one country, two systems’ model had been terminated and signalled its intention to withdraw privileges granted to the territory. This will hurt Hong Kong’s economy, though the pro-democracy movement is willing to pay the price too.
Joseph Yu Shek Cheng is a retired professor of political science based in Hong Kong. https://www.eastasiaforum.org/2020/06/24/the-end-of-one-country-two-systems/
Comments
Post a Comment